KRC Genk II vs Patro Eisden

This match between KRC Genk II and Patro Eisden is anticipated to be a closely contested affair, with betting odds suggesting a low-scoring game. The high probability for both teams not to score indicates defensive strategies may dominate. The odds for under 2.5 goals at 73.20% and over 1.5 goals at 63.50% highlight the uncertainty in scoring dynamics, suggesting a possible low-scoring draw or one-goal margin victory.

KRC Genk II

Patro Eisden

Predictions:

Prediction Analysis

• Under 2.5 Goals: 73.20% – The likelihood of fewer than three goals suggests both teams might prioritize defense, potentially leading to a stalemate or a tight contest.
• Both Teams Not to Score: 78.00% – With a significant chance of no goals, it’s plausible that neither side will break through the other’s defense, resulting in a goalless draw.
• Both Teams Not To Score In 1st Half: 97.90% – The high probability of no goals in the first half suggests initial caution from both sides, possibly setting up a tactical battle.
• Home Team Not To Score In 1st Half: 98.30% – KRC Genk II may struggle to find the net early on, indicating strong defensive play from Patro Eisden.
• Away Team Not To Score In 1st Half: 66.00% – Patro Eisden’s defense might hold firm initially, but there’s room for potential offensive adjustments as the match progresses.
• Both Teams Not To Score In 2nd Half: 81.90% – Even in the second half, the likelihood of maintaining a clean sheet remains high, reinforcing expectations of a low-scoring encounter.
• Away Team Not To Score In 2nd Half: 69.30% – Patro Eisden might continue their defensive resilience into the latter stages, though opportunities for KRC Genk II could arise.
• Home Team Not To Score In 2nd Half: 64.00% – Despite potential offensive efforts, KRC Genk II may find it challenging to penetrate Patro Eisden’s defense in the second half.
• Over 1.5 Goals: 63.50% – While the odds are close, there’s still a reasonable chance for more than one goal, suggesting possible bursts of activity or late-game efforts.
• Avg. Total Goals: 3.07 – Historically, matches have seen around three goals on average, indicating occasional scoring opportunities despite defensive setups.
• Avg. Conceded Goals: 2.47 – Both teams have conceded close to two and a half goals per game on average, pointing to potential vulnerabilities in defense.
• Avg. Goals Scored: 1.80 – With an average of nearly two goals scored per match by each team, there could be moments of offensive breakthroughs.