The upcoming match between Whitstable Town and Hungerford Town is expected to be a thrilling encounter. With both teams eager to secure a victory, the predictions suggest a high-scoring affair. The odds for over 1.5 goals stand at 83.10, indicating that goals are likely to be plentiful. The possibility of over 2.5 goals is even more pronounced with odds of 64.30, suggesting an open and attacking match. Both teams have shown the ability to score, reflected in the 61.50 odds for both teams to score.
Whitstable Town
DWWDW-Hungerford Town
LDWLWDate: 2025-09-27Time: 14:00Venue: The Belmont GroundPredictions:
| Market | Prediction | Odd | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 1.5 Goals | 80.00% | Make Bet | |
| Over 2.5 Goals | 69.60% | Make Bet | |
| Both Teams To Score | 64.20% | Make Bet | |
| Away Team Not To Score In 1st Half | 59.10% | Make Bet | |
| Over 2.5 BTTS | 52.30% | Make Bet |
Betting Predictions
Over 1.5 Goals
With an odds of 83.10, betting on over 1.5 goals appears to be a safe bet. Given the attacking nature of both teams, it is anticipated that at least two goals will be scored during the match.
Over 2.5 Goals
The odds for over 2.5 goals are set at 64.30, which suggests a strong likelihood of a high-scoring game. Both teams have been consistent in finding the back of the net, making this prediction quite favorable.
Both Teams To Score
The odds for both teams to score are 61.50, indicating that it is almost equally likely that each team will manage to find the net during the match. This reflects the balanced offensive capabilities of both sides.
Away Team Not To Score In 1st Half
The odds for Hungerford Town not scoring in the first half are 56.70, suggesting that Whitstable Town might have a stronger start and could potentially take an early lead before Hungerford finds their rhythm.
Over 2.5 BTTS (Both Teams To Score)
With odds at 52.20, betting on over 2.5 BTTS indicates that both teams are expected to score more than twice combined throughout the match, underscoring the attacking potential and defensive vulnerabilities of both sides.
