Based on the data provided, this match between Haruna Arakawa and Nick Lagaev is expected to be a closely contested affair. The betting odds suggest a balanced match with several key predictions. The likelihood of the first set having over 17.5 games is 57.50%, indicating a potential for a longer set. Conversely, the probability of the first set having under 17.5 games stands at 63.40%, suggesting that shorter sets are also quite likely.
Arakawa, Haruna
WLLWL-Lagaev, Nick
LLLWLDate: 2025-10-28Time: 14:00(FT)Venue: Not Available YetScore: 2-1
Predictions:
| Market | Prediction | Odd | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Over 1st Set Games | 56.10% | (2-1) | |
| Tie Break in 1st Set (No) | 93.80% | (2-1) | |
| Under 1st Set Games | 64.50% | (2-1) | |
| Tie Break in Match (No) | 79.70% | (2-1) | |
| Under 2.5 Sets | 75.70% | (2-1) | |
| Total Games 3-Way (Under 22) | 72.70% | (2-1) | |
| Total Games 2-Way (Under 22.5) | 67.40% | (2-1) |
There is a strong chance (94.10%) that the first set will not go to a tiebreak, which could imply decisive play early in the set. The odds for no tiebreak in the match are even higher at 79.70%, pointing towards decisive outcomes in the initial sets.
Betting Predictions
- Over 1st Set Games: 57.50%
- Tie Break in 1st Set (No): 94.10%
- Under 1st Set Games: 63.40%
- Tie Break in Match (No): 79.70%
- Under 2.5 Sets: 76.90%
- Total Games 3-Way (Under 22): 71.00%
- Total Games 2-Way (Under 22.5): 68.20%
The odds suggest that fewer than two and a half sets are likely, with a probability of 76.90%. This indicates that either player could potentially secure an early advantage leading to a shorter match overall.
Additional Expert Predictions
Given the betting data, it’s plausible to predict that the match will be competitive with neither player having a clear upper hand initially. The high probability of no tiebreaks in both the first set and the match as a whole suggests that one player might assert dominance early on, potentially leading to decisive victories in individual sets.
The odds for total games being under certain thresholds further hint at an efficient play style by one or both players, potentially focusing on quick points rather than prolonged rallies.
